[
  {
    "section": "s1",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "1. Width does not name a learning mechanism"
  },
  {
    "section": "s2",
    "kind": "source_based_review",
    "sources": [
      "dl2-a01-1",
      "dl2-a01-2",
      "dl2-a01-3",
      "dl2-a01-4",
      "dl2-a01-5",
      "dl2-a01-6"
    ],
    "claim": "2. What the selected primary papers establish"
  },
  {
    "section": "s3",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "3. The finite tangent identity is exact under its assumptions"
  },
  {
    "section": "s4",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "4. Freezing the Jacobian defines a different model"
  },
  {
    "section": "s5",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "5. The spectrum determines learning rates within the frozen model"
  },
  {
    "section": "s6",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "6. A factorized scalar model makes kernel movement explicit"
  },
  {
    "section": "s7",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "7. A changing kernel does not automatically mean better features"
  },
  {
    "section": "s8",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "8. Taylor remainder exposes the approximation error"
  },
  {
    "section": "s9",
    "kind": "source_based_review",
    "sources": [
      "dl2-a01-3",
      "dl2-a01-5"
    ],
    "claim": "9. Parameterization and limits must be taken in a stated order"
  },
  {
    "section": "s10",
    "kind": "source_based_review",
    "sources": [
      "dl2-a01-4"
    ],
    "claim": "10. Architecture-aware assumptions are not optional details"
  },
  {
    "section": "s11",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "11. Training agreement is not a generalization theorem"
  },
  {
    "section": "s12",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "12. A reproducible analytical comparison"
  },
  {
    "section": "s13",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "13. A study that can distinguish the competing explanations"
  },
  {
    "section": "s14",
    "kind": "author_analysis_or_verification_proposal",
    "sources": [],
    "claim": "14. What a defensible interpretation would say"
  }
]